{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "source": {
    "type": "cofc_public_opinion",
    "short_cite": "ASRC Federal Infrastructure Support, LLC v. United States, No. 1:26-cv-00451 (Fed. Cl. 2026)",
    "source_url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cofc-1_26-cv-00451"
  },
  "passages": [
    {
      "passage_id": "cofc_opinion_conclusion",
      "title": "COFC conclusion",
      "tags": ["cofc", "conclusion", "holding", "irreparable_harm"],
      "source_url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cofc-1_26-cv-00451",
      "source_page_start": 18,
      "source_page_end": 18,
      "text": "VI. CONCLUSION\nAFIS has failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of some of its claims; on others, it may still prevail on a fuller record, but the record at this stage does not permit a finding that it is likely to prevail. AFIS has shown on this record that it is likely to succeed on its claim that the evaluations of Dawson's proposals under Factors 1 and 4 were arbitrary and capricious. AFIS cannot show, however, that it will be irreparably harmed by this error, as it can be remedied by requiring DHS to reevaluate the proposals and conduct a new best-value determination with the revised ratings. If AFIS prevails on its motion for judgment on the administrative record, the agency will be required to reevaluate the existing proposals. That remedy can offer AFIS the relief it seeks. The motion for a preliminary injunction is denied."
    },
    {
      "passage_id": "cofc_opinion_factors_1_4",
      "title": "COFC merits on Factors 1 and 4",
      "tags": ["cofc", "holding", "factor_1", "factor_4"],
      "source_url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cofc-1_26-cv-00451",
      "source_page_start": 17,
      "source_page_end": 17,
      "text": "AFIS has shown on this record that it is likely to succeed on its claim that the evaluations of Dawson's proposals under Factors 1 and 4 were arbitrary and capricious."
    },
    {
      "passage_id": "cofc_opinion_no_irreparable_harm",
      "title": "COFC no irreparable harm",
      "tags": ["cofc", "holding", "irreparable_harm", "preliminary_injunction"],
      "source_url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cofc-1_26-cv-00451",
      "source_page_start": 18,
      "source_page_end": 18,
      "text": "AFIS cannot show, however, that it will be irreparably harmed by this error, as it can be remedied by requiring DHS to reevaluate the proposals and conduct a new best-value determination with the revised ratings. If AFIS prevails on its motion for judgment on the administrative record, the agency will be required to reevaluate the existing proposals. That remedy can offer AFIS the relief it seeks. The motion for a preliminary injunction is denied."
    }
  ]
}