Single place for DHA pursuit structure: graph-linked relationships, pipeline posture, Vendor Day synthesis, spend context, and source-backed capture Q&A. Open a tile when you are ready to work that thread.
Listen
Executive Briefing
Winning Defense Health Bids with Data
A short audio briefing on using structured intelligence, past performance, and risk signals to improve DHA capture strategy.
Company compare and other views stay in the tab row above.
Live pursuit signals & readouts
Vendor Day, contract strategy, incumbents, integration seams, and transition timing—refreshed from workspace data when available.
Methodology, operating sequence & references
Operating sequence: Graph → Pipeline Strategy / Intelligence → Vendor Day → USAspend → Phil (provenance visible).
Strategic premise
Large pursuits usually fail on unreconciled data, not missing files. This workspace keeps vendors, programs, risks, and acquisition signals on one checkable graph so assertions can be traced and updated.
Why DHA stresses the model
Multi-contract incumbency, unsettled integration authority, modular competition, and transition timing stay visible as the government story moves.
Through-line
Built for enterprise-scale evidence and auditability: graph semantics and traceability so capture conversations anchor on sources, not the last forwarded deck.
Intended outputs
- Bid/no-bid and teaming talks tied to a shared evidence graph
- PWin lines leadership can walk back to sources
- Faster realignment when acquisition signals shift
- One operating picture for DHA posture vs live DHA signals
Shareable deep links: #graph, #pipeline-strategy, #vendor-day, #pipeline-intelligence, #company-lookup, #usaspend, #phil. (#past-performance and #past_performance redirect to #company-lookup.)
DHA relationship graph
Raw JSONPrograms, vendors, signals, and risk—click nodes and edges for detail.
Legend: Gold ring = incumbent · red = transition risk · purple = modular seam · navy = pipeline. Relationship text on lines is hidden by default — click an edge to read it. Click a node for full detail.
DHA capture positioning
- Modular competition is increasing — Government is asking how to group capabilities and optimize competition.
- Integration authority is unresolved — draft TI = System Integration; Q&A still tests one/many SI vs none.
- Transition risk is the critical decision variable — bridge, OCI, and contractor-change timing dominate.
- DHA fits as an integration-enabling capture play — anchor on governance, Rhapsody/Med-COI complexity, and disciplined teaming.
Selection detail
Strategic key
Win strategy
Risks
How to use this graph
Pan and zoom the map. Click any node to read provenance, pipeline fields (when linked), and sources. Click empty space to return here.
Highlight rings
- Gold — incumbent
- Red — transition risk (also thick red edges)
- Purple — modular breakpoint / competition seam
- Navy — pipeline opportunity
Suggested starting points
DHA Capture Portfolio: Data-Driven Decision Matrix
Portfolio posture from data/inputs/dha_decision_matrix.json — same rows power Phil keyword matching on the Phil tab.
Pipeline Intelligence
Pipeline intel JSON
Opportunities are discovered from DHA/Pipeline research files (.txt / .md).
PWin, status, and strategy merge with data/inputs/dha_pipeline.json when names align.
Override the folder with env DHA_PIPELINE_RESEARCH_DIR.
Opportunity detail
Summary
Strategy snapshot
Risks
Win themes
Next steps
Evidence (research files)
Vendor Day — capture synthesis
Synthesis JSON
What we learned from Industry Day / contract-strategy materials and how it should steer DHA posture. Content is loaded from
data/inputs/dha_vendor_day_synthesis.json
(synthesized from in-repo portfolio strategy, pipeline, matrix, and strategy JSON).
Company compare
Comparison register JSON SAM notices JSONCompare a target company against a named peer (for example ASRC Federal) using local USAspending samples, your BD comparison register, and SAM DHA exports — triangulation for capture posture, not a substitute for FPDS or CPARS.
This view may include non-DHA DoD awards when the selected company appears outside DHA.
Programs, agencies, roles, and proof points for capture narratives. Source:
data/inputs/asrc_past_performance.json
— replace placeholder rows with verified BD / CPARS data before external use.
USAspending sample (DuckDB)
Gate review JSON
Rows from the local DHA DuckDB slice (prefers direct_dha_core when present, otherwise
usaspending_awards_normalized in policygraph.duckdb when those tables exist; else legacy FPDS file). Keyword match plus DHA / Defense Health style filters — same resolver as gate review.
Gate review (pipeline × DuckDB)
Keyword-scored opportunities from data/inputs/dha_pipeline.csv against the same database. PWin / decision are heuristic scores from the gate engine, not the leadership matrix.
PURSUIT analyst — matrix-backed Q&A
Phil is ready for questions.
Pursuit framing: incumbent fragility, takeover vector, PTW / technical debt, and GAO context — grounded in the leadership matrix and optional bounded channels (verify primary sources).
Matrix match is deterministic (no LLM). JSON may include intelligence_profile, pursuit_frame, reference_prior_dag (editorial UX weights), and incumbent_posture (heuristic from matrix fields only). Full policy Phil: POST /api/phil/ask.
Selecting a sample fills the box below — edit if needed, then submit.